GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. (GENK)

Website

Yahoo Finance

June. 04, 2025
Q1 2025 Data
Price: $4.25,  Shares: 33m,  Cap: $140m. 

Summary
*A restaurant chain whose stock price had dropped over 70% from its IPO price of $12 in 2023. It was caused by comparable sales drop and higher expenses, as a result its profit went downward. 

* The UP-C based A&B dual share structure and the financial leasing accounting also caused confusion for retail investors, and the limited public float (less than 5m) make it unsuitable for institutional investors.

* If the business stabilizes, it is expected to generate at least $250m in revenue, $15m to $20m in real EBITDA and $10m to $15m in real profit. The current $140m market cap has been more than discounted for the downward risk. 

Business
(1) History 
 The company was founded by David Kim and Jae Chang, both Korean immigrants, in 2011.  They captured the getting popular Korean cuisine by opening the all-you-can-eat KBBQ restaurants.  By 2019, it had opened 28 restaurants and generated $113m in annual revenue. Then the Covid hit, it came out ok with 6 new restaurants been opened in 2022. It IPOed in the middle of 2023, raised around $46m at $12/share. Ended with over $180m in revenue for that year. 

Since the time of IPO, it continued its expansion plan by opened 6 restaurants in 2023, 6 in 2024 and 6 more in Q1 2025. The current revenue run rate is expected to be around $250m. 

However, since 2024, its comparable sales started sliding. It contracted by 5% in 2024 and 0.7% in Q1 2025. Also, its restaurant EBITDA margin has decreased while its SG&A expense is up. Its real EBITDA drop from $4m - $6m per quarter to around $3m - $4m per quarter. 

Currently, as of Q1 2025, it operates 49 Ken BBQ restaurants. It targets to open around 10 new restaurants per year for year 2025 and 2026.  


(2) Product & Services 
GEN BBQ: For each store usually generates around $5m in AUC. Both food and labour cost around 30%, rental around 10%, added other expenses, usually a restaurant generates 15% to 20% in EBITDA. Since the IPO, the number has slide toward the lower end. 

The restaurant is AYCE style which charges the customer a flat fee of around $20 for lunch and $30-$35 for dinner. There is a premium menu which will charge $20 more. 

Kan Sushi: It is currently testing a dual store model, which put a GEN BBQ and a sushi store together. There is currently only one location using this format. 

The cost of opening a new restaurant is around $2m to $3m. Usually, it can be paid back around just 2 years. However, lately this is getting longer. It plans to open 2 restaurants in South Korea this year. The cost of opening a new restaurant and labour cost are significantly lower in Korea. 

(3) Industry 
The casual dinning industry is very sensitive to economic conditions. Thus, by nature it is very cyclical.  Whenever there is a high inflation, a recession or merely an uncertainty, the consumer would tend to cut down dining outside. 

In 2021 and 2022, the sector enjoyed a very high growth post-pandemic. However, since 2023, caused by high inflation, people are more towards takeout and drive-through than dining out. For the first quarter of 2025, as the tariff war starts, consumer started to be cautions on spending again. 

In 2024, red lobster filed for bankruptcy. 

On the other side, the casual dining industry paints a much different picture. It has been enjoying much better growth post-pandemic. It seems to be a shift from fine-dining towards to fast casual dining. 

Major competitors:
KPOT: A franchise chain features both Korean hotpot and BBQ together, which grew very fast to over 100 restaurants already. It is also AYCE and charged similar price to GEN BBQ. 


(4) Seasonality 
It seems the second and third quarter are better than the first quarter and fourth quarter. 


(5)Employees
As of Dec. 2024, it employs around 2700 employees. Around 60 per restaurant. 


2. Management
(1) Management
David Kim: CEO. He was an immigrant from South Korea at a young age. Entered restaurant businesses at his early age. In 2006, with his brother and some other investor, they bought the troubled Baja Fresh fast food chain and try to turn it around. He became the CEO of Baja Fresh and was featured in one of the episodes of the under-covered boss TV show. In 2011, he stepped down from CEO of Baja Fresh and started the GEN BBQ restaurant chain. 


(2) Ownership and Compensation
David Family: 170k A shares + 10.7m B shares, 33%
Jae Chang: Co-founder, holds 8.3m B shares. 25%. 
All major shareholders and insiders together own around 40% of A shares + 100% of B shares. 

David was paid around $300k in 2023 and 2024 which is very modest. 

3. Financial data

Notes: debt 
5m government debt. 

Notes: Share Data
5m A shares + 28m B shares. The B share has 10 votes for each share. 

Options: Very few options are outstanding.

4. Valuation and comments
(1) The company is currently valued at less than 60% of its annual revenue.  Around 8x of its 2024 real EBITDA, and around just 10x of it actual income or FCF. It is quite cheap even if it stops growing and just maintains the current profit. Obviously, the market is thinking the business will go downward going forward. 

(2) I think the comparable sales decline is caused by both the industry headwind and the managements focus on opening new restaurants. It is somewhat concerning, but I feel it will be stabilized eventually. 

(3) The management has a long history of running the fast food restaurant industry. Especially, they used to buy troubled restaurants and turn their business around. Those experience should add some confidence that they could face future operation challenges. 

(4) Assuming it generates $250m in revenue and 15% in restaurant EBITDA. It could generate around $37.5m profit before SG&A. It can easily generate around $15m-$20m EBT if it just cut down its corporate expenses. 

5. Risk
(1) The casual dinning industry is currently experiencing a headwind. It might last a very long time, or it might never recover. 

(2) The KBBQ space has no barrier to enter. The entering of other players or the current competitions both could significantly shrink its profitability or even force it to close restaurants. 

(3) If not managed well, its restaurants could easily become unprofitable. 

(4) Consumer's love for Korean cuisine might change and shift to other new dining options.


6. Conclusion
This company has been growing very well in the past and currently is experiencing sone headwinds. The current valuation is very attractive. However, a casual dining restaurant chain could change very fast. Should watch it very closely. 


7. Links










Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF)



Website
Yahoo Finance

Mar. 12, 2025
Q4 2024 Data
Price: $11.35,  Shares: 5.2m,  Cap: $60m. 

Summary
(1) A fast-growing company in a niche market whose revenue had stalled in the last several years. 

(2) The company is founder-lead and their interests are aligned with shareholders. 

(3) It has been very profitable for many years and the current valuation is at almost its lowest in recent years. 

(4) If the company could regain revenue growth, it would enjoy both earning expansion and valuation expansion.

Business
(1) History 
 The company was founded by John Saunders in 1995. Originally it was called IMI(Integrated Management Information) Global. Later in 2003, his wife Leann Saunders joined the company, and they took it public in 2006. At the time of the IPO, it had around $1m in revenue in 2005. It grew really fast in the next 14 years with revenue doubling every 3 or 4 years. In total,  it doubled more than 4 times to achieve over $20m in revenue in 2019. However, since 2020, it experienced the first down year and revenue staled at around $20m to $25m till now. It was cash-positive in 2010 and has been profitable since then.

In 2012, it changed its name to Where Food Comes From Inc.  Since 2012, it acquired quite a lot of small players in the food certification industry. Those acquisitions are mostly very small. 


(2) Product & Services 
Food Verification and Certification
Verify and certify food production, mainly from the cattle industry. It counts around 80% of its revenue. It seems the verification are mostly based on onsite visit or desk audit, but not based on cattle numbers that they audit. Currently, the beef certification business is around 50% of total revenue. 

 USDA Organic: WFCF is one of the USDA-accredited certifying agent. Compete with many other agents.
 CARE Certificate: Make sure animals are traded well.
 Non-GMO: One of the four agents.
 Upcycled Certificate: Food uses previously might be dumped ingredients. Exclusive, grew well. 


Product Sale (cattle identification ear tags)
The tag it sells seems to be the EID tag which contains a 15-digit number that can be read electronically. Product revenue is highly tied to the number of new cattle that need to be tracked each year. The tag price is around $2 to $2.5 each. The product revenue counts around 10% to 20% of total revenue. It peaked in 2019 at 19%. Now it is around 15% of total revenue. 

Professional Services:
Consulting, data analysis, reporting, and technology solutions. <5% of total revenue.

Others:
In 2018, it invested around $1m for 10% interest in Progressive Beef. A certification service company focuses on animal warfare. From 2018 to 2024, it totally distributed over $1.5m dividend to WFCF. In 2024 alone, the dividend is $400k. 

In 2022, it bought 7 bitcoin for around $178k(25k/bitcoin). Now they worth around $500k. 

(3) Industry 
The company's revenue is highly tied to the US cattle industry. New in 2024 annual report: 
"Additionally, the cattle industry is cyclical by nature based on factors impacting current and future supplies such as drought-induced feedlot placements, higher cow and heifer slaughter, and lower auction receipts. The production lags inherent to this industry lead to long-lasting impacts of production decisions. For example, increased liquidation implies tighter supplies for next year. Similarly, times of herd expansion are typically a multi-year period. Historically, these cycles typically lasted approximately 10 years. The beginning of 2024 marks the tenth year of the current cycle that began in 2014. We are currently in the contraction phase of the cycle after peaking in 2018-2019. How long we continue to contract will be directly impacted by drought and pasture conditions."





(4) Seasonality 
Based on the annual report: "Significant portions of our verification and certification service revenue is typically realized during late May through early October when the calf marketings and the growing seasons are at their peak."

It looks like Q1 is the weakest quarter. Then, it gradually increases and peaks in Q3. Q4 is similar to Q2.  Q1 revenue tends to be 10% less than Q2/Q4 while Q3 revenue tends to be 5% more than Q2/Q4.

(5)Employees

It has only around 20 employees before 2012. Quickly jumped to 47 in 2013. It stayed around this level until 2020 while revenue almost quadrupled.  Since 2021 it added almost 30 new employees while revenue was almost flat.  

2. Management
(1) Management
John Saunders: CEO. 
Leann Saunders: COO

(2) Ownership and Compensation
John & Leann Saunders: 1.74m shares, 31.7%
Graeme P. Rein (From Yorkmont Capital): 670k shares, 12%
All major shareholders and insiders together own around 49%. 

Both John and Leann were paid $530k in 2023. 

3. Financial data

Notes: debt 
none. 

Notes: Share Data
Roughly around 23m shares outstanding at IPO time of 2006. Shares didn't change much through the years. In Dec. 2020, it did a 4 for 1 reverse split. Since 2019, it started share repurchases for several years which reduced the outstanding shares from 6m to the current 5.2m. The total spent on share repurchase is around $13m.

Options: Very few options are outstanding.

4. Valuation and comments
(1) Although the cattle industry has been in contraction since 2019, the company still grew its verification revenue from $15m to $20m from 2019 to 2024. While its overall revenue has been flat from 2022 to 2024, the verification revenue has grown 10% and 5% in the last two years. On the other hand, the product sales (tags) have been flat since 2020. Overall, the business seems to be very resilient. 

(2) From 2015 to 2020, its tag revenue more than tripled from $1.2m to $4m while its verification revenue just doubled. It seems a combination of doubling its customers base while added new tag sales to existing customers. Based on the $2to $2.5 tag price, I estimated that it overlooks around 1.5m to 2m cattle.

(3) Currently, it is traded around 20x P/E and 2.2x EV/sales. It doesn't seem cheap, but it is actually on it historically low point of the company. 

(4) As a net beef importer, the tariff war between US and Canada might cause US to import less beef, which will benefit the US cattle industry. 

(5) The investing in Progress Beef seems a great investment. It alone should add around $5m to $10m value to the company. 

5. Risk
(1) Obviously, the cattle industry cycle will affect WFCF's business a lot. If the industry continues to contract, its revenue might even start to go down. 

(2) Tariff war could cause the company to loss revenue if its customers are exporters of beef. 

6. Conclusion
This company is very managed and very stable. The current price is not very cheap but acceptable. Need to watch the cattle industry very closely. 


7. Links